JC1 · H2 Mathematics · Study guide
Build complete rational and conic sketches, use them to solve range and intersection tasks, and work through transformations, derived graphs and parametric limits.
A sketch needs features, not just a calculator picture
Find the domain, axial intercepts, asymptotes and stationary points. Use these to position each branch. When a later part asks about roots or inequalities, rewrite its equation as an intersection with the graph you have already drawn.
Long division reveals the asymptotes
Sketch a rational curve completely
Sketch , showing asymptotes, intercepts and stationary points.
The domain excludes . As , ; as , . Thus is a vertical asymptote. Since the final fraction tends to zero as , the oblique asymptote is .
At , . The numerator is positive for every real , so there are no x-intercepts.
At , . At , . The derivative is positive when , and negative when . Hence is a maximum and is a minimum. There is a break at the vertical asymptote between them.
The left branch lies below because ; the right branch lies above it. These checks fix the branches' positions.
Prove which y-values are possible
Use a horizontal line and the discriminant
For the same curve, prove algebraically that is impossible. Hence determine how many real roots has as varies.
Intersect the curve with and rearrange as a quadratic in :
Real intersections require , so or . The endpoints occur at the stationary points. Also cannot be a root of the rearranged equation: it would give . Thus no invalid root has been introduced.
The range is . The equation has two distinct real roots for or , one repeated real root for or 6, and no real roots for .
At k = 6, the horizontal line touches at x = 3: one repeated root.
A parameter question: do not count an excluded point
Use the given asymptotes to recover coefficients
The curve has vertical asymptote and oblique asymptote . Find , then the condition for no stationary points.
The vertical asymptote gives . Use the oblique asymptote as the quotient:
Comparing coefficients gives and . The stated vertical asymptote requires .
For , there are two distinct permitted stationary x-values. For , the square would be negative, so there are none. Hence is the required condition.
If , the rule simplifies to a straight line with a hole at . It fails the stated vertical-asymptote condition. A zero discriminant in an equation obtained after clearing denominators does not automatically give a stationary point.
Complete the square and select the required half
A conic written in expanded form
Identify , and give the equation and domain of its lower half.
This is an ellipse with centre , horizontal radius 3 and vertical radius 2. Its horizontal vertices are ; its vertical vertices are .
For the lower half, , so choose the negative square root:
The expression under the root must be non-negative. The endpoints are included and lie on the centre's horizontal line. Choosing the other sign gives the upper half.
Count intersections without relying on the scale of a sketch
Changing an ellipse can change four intersections into two
For , find when the ellipse meets the hyperbola in exactly four points.
Put and . Both must be non-negative.
Since , . Four distinct points require , giving two signs for each coordinate offset. Hence .
At , : only two points remain, and . For , , so there are no real intersections.
For the illustrated value , the offsets are and . Substitution checks all four points. The asymptotes are .
Recognise the hyperbola from parametric equations
If and , then
This follows from .
The parameter range decides whether both branches or only one branch is traced. For , , so only is traced.
For parametric asymptotes, follow both coordinates
Different parameter limits can give different vertical lines
A curve has , , with and . Find its asymptotes.
The denominator vanishes at , but the asymptotes are lines in the x-y plane, not equations in .
Thus is a vertical asymptote. At the excluded upper parameter endpoint,
Thus is another vertical asymptote. Finally,
Hence is a horizontal asymptote. A finite limit of one coordinate gives an asymptote only when the other coordinate tends to infinity. Note that on the given parameter interval.
Track points to keep the order of transformations clear
An input change and an output change together
The graph has minimum point and x-intercepts . Find their images on , and describe a sequence of transformations.
A source point moves to an x-value satisfying , with new y-value :
Thus the minimum becomes a maximum at . The old x-intercepts move to and ; they are not new x-intercepts.
One valid sequence is: translate 1 unit in the negative x-direction, scale by factor 1/3 parallel to the x-axis, scale by factor 2 parallel to the y-axis, reflect in the x-axis, then translate 5 units upwards.
The equation after each step checks the sequence. For , the final rule is , which has maximum .
Reverse transformations for an implicit curve
A circle is translated 1 unit left, 2 units up, then scaled by factor 3 parallel to the y-axis.
The final ellipse has centre , horizontal radius 2 and vertical radius 6. Replace the old y-coordinate by in the entire translated equation; scaling changes the centre's y-coordinate too.
Modulus and reciprocal: change the right feature
Three derived graphs from the same quadratic
For , sketch , , and .
The original roots are 0 and 2, and the minimum is . For , reflect only the part below the x-axis:
The reflected part has maximum , and the roots remain 0 and 2. The roots become corners.
For , retain the original right half and reflect it to the left:
This even graph has minima , and roots . The origin is a corner maximum, so it is not a stationary point.
For the reciprocal, the zeros of become vertical asymptotes:
The asymptotes are . There are no axial intercepts. At , , and the derivative changes from positive to negative: is a maximum. The outer branches are positive; the central branch is negative.
Does a vertical asymptote become a reciprocal intercept?
If , then
The reciprocal approaches zero as , but it remains undefined at because the original is undefined there. Mark a hole at ; it is not an included x-intercept. The new vertical asymptote is .
A derivative graph records gradients
Use stationary points and increasing or decreasing intervals
For , sketch and explain how its signs match the original curve.
The derivative graph is an upward parabola, with roots , and minimum . It is positive outside and negative inside. Thus increases up to its maximum , decreases to its minimum , then increases again.
At a maximum the derivative crosses from positive to negative; at a minimum it crosses from negative to positive. At a stationary point of inflexion it can touch zero without changing sign: for , touches zero at the origin.
The y-coordinate on a derivative graph is a gradient, not the original graph's height. An original intercept does not normally give a derivative intercept.
Recover a graph from its modulus and gradient signs
Choose the sign on each part
A differentiable function satisfies , with for and for . Recover .
The modulus gives the shape but loses the sign. For , the branch has negative gradient, so retain it above the axis. Between −1 and 0, the positive modulus branch has positive gradient; reflect it below the axis to get the required negative gradient.
Between 0 and 1, the reflected branch has positive gradient. For , retain the positive outer branch, which also has positive gradient. All four pieces therefore join as
The function is differentiable at both roots and has minimum . Its modulus is the stated one, and has exactly the required signs. Choosing every branch above the axis would fail the gradient information.
Before you finish
- Do the asymptotes refer to the x-y plane and respect the domain?
- Are range endpoints attained, and are extraneous roots excluded?
- Did a squared conic equation introduce an unwanted half or branch?
- Are transformed points still intercepts after a vertical translation?
- For modulus, reciprocal and derivative graphs, have you changed the appropriate feature and kept all exclusions?